tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13948933.post112055102745872281..comments2024-02-18T08:38:49.284-06:00Comments on Theological Meditations: Bishop James Ussher (1581–1656) on the Atonement; Or, the True Intent and Extent of Christ’s Death and Satisfaction Upon the CrossTony Byrnehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02102293843397809802noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13948933.post-1121035434746760622005-07-10T17:43:00.000-05:002005-07-10T17:43:00.000-05:00Hi Tony,Actually I think Amyraut was a dualist too...Hi Tony,<BR/><BR/>Actually I think Amyraut was a dualist too. Quick cites him as saying:<BR/>"That Jesus Christ died for all men sufficiently, but for the elect only effectually: and that<BR/>consequentially his intention was to die for all men in respect of the sufficiency of his satisfaction, but for the elect only in respect of its quickening and saving virtue and efficacy; which is to say, Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com