Showing posts with label Augustine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Augustine. Show all posts

December 26, 2025

William Laud (1573–1645) on the Catholic View of the Extent of the Atonement, the Synod of Dort, and the Error of Arminius; With Sources Cited

For that Christ died for all men is the universal and constant doctrine of the Catholic Church in all ages,s and no ‘error of Arminius:’ and are the express words of Scripture itself, in more places than one.t And the Synod of Dort,u called purposely about the errors of Arminius, allows this for orthodox; Christum mortuum esse pro omnibus. And for my part I wish with all my heart, that this had been the greatest error of Arminius.
_______________
s “Christus crucifixus propter genus humanum.” [Εἰ γὰρ καὶ ὁ πατὴρ αὐτοῦ καὶ αὐτὸς παθεῖν ταῦτα αὐτὸν ὑπὲρ τοῦ ἀνθρωπείου γένους ἐνήργησεν.]—S. Just. Mart. Dial. cum Tryph. p. 246. [§ 95, p. 192. C. Paris. 1742.]

“Tota natura redempta.”—Athan. de Incarn. Christi. Edit. Con. p. 66. [ἡ κτίσις πᾶσα λελύτρωται.—[S.] Athan. de Incarn. [§ 37. Op., tom. i. p. 79. C. Paris. 1698.]

“Pro omni humano grege.” [πάσης τῆς ἀνθρωπίνης ἀγέλης.]—Euseb. L. 10. De Demonstr. Evang. in præfat. [p. 462. De. Colon. 1688.]

“Pro orbe universo.” [ῥανίδες αἵματος ὀλίγαι κόσμον ὅλον ἀναπλάττουσαι.]—Greg. Naz. Orat. xlii. [Op., tom. i. p. 696. D. Paris. 1630.]

[“Venit Redemptor, et dedit pretium, fudit sanguinem suum, emit orbem terrarum.”—S.] Aug. in Ps. 95. Op., tom. iv. col. 1478. B.]

“Pro proditore suo” [“et ideo nec proditorem debuerat præterire, ut adverterent omnes, quod in electione etiam proditoris sui servandorum omium insigne prætendit.”]—S. Ambros. L. de Paradiso, cap. viii [Op., tom. i. col. 161.] “Pro iis qui curari nolunt.” [Ideo omnibus opem sanitatis detulit, ut quicunque perierit mortis suæ causas sibi ascribat, qui curari noluit, cum remedium haberet, quo posset evadere.”] S. Amb. L. 2. de Cain & Abel, c. iii. [Ibid. col. 211.]

“Pro Gentibus, sed illæ non voluerunt” [ὁ μὲν Χριστὸς καὶ ἀπέθανεν ὑπὲρ Ἑλλήνων … πῶς οὖν, φησίν, οὐκ ἐπίστευσαν; ὅτι οὐκ ἐθέλησαν.]—S. Chrysost. Hom. 7. in 1 Tim. 2. [Op., tom. xi. p. 586. D.]

“Pro omnibus, si omnes redimi vellent”—S. Hieron. in 1 Tim. ii. 1. [Pelag. apud S Hier. Op., tom. xi col. 1046. A.] Primasius, ibid. [apud Bibl. Max. Patr. tom. x. p. 237. H.]

“Nulla ratio dubitandi est … [sed prorsus pro omnibus mortuus est Christus].”—Prosper. [seu ignotus auctor.] lib. ii. de Vocat. Gent. c. 16. [apud S. Prosper. Op., col. 904. c. Paris. 1711.]

“Non pro fidelibus tantum, sed pro, &c.” [Χάριτι τὸν υἱὸν αὐτοῦ ἔδωκε εἰς θάνατον, οὐχ ὑπὲρ τῶν πιστῶν δὲ μόνον, ἀλλ’ ὑπὲρ τῆς οἰκουμένης ἁπάσης.]—Theoph. in Heb. ii. 9. [p. 890. Lond. 1636.] Œcumenius, ibid. [Εἰ γὰρ καὶ μή πάντες ἐσώθησαν διὰ τὴν οἰκείαν ἀπιστίαν, αὐτὸς μέντοι τὸ οἰκεῖον ἐπὶ πάντας καὶ ὑπὲρ πάντων ἐποίησεν.—Œcum. Comm. vol. ii. p. 329. B. Lut. Par. 1631.]

t S. Jo. iii. 17; 2 Cor. v. 15; Heb. ii. 9; 1 Tim. ii. 6; 1 Tim. iv. 10; 1 S. Jo. ii. 1, 2.

u “Nemo mortalium est, qui non possit vere et serio per ministros evangelii vocari ad participationem remissionis peccatorum et vitæ æternæ per mortem Christi. (Act. xiii. 38, et S. Jo. iii 17, 18.) Evangelio autem nihil falsum aut simulatum sebest; sed quicquid in eo per ministros offertur, aut promittitur hominibus, id eodem modo ab Authore Evangelii offertur et promittitur iisdem …

“Sic ergo Christus pro omnibus mortuus est, ut omnes et singuli, mediante, fide possint virtute ἀντιλύτρον hujus remissionem peccatorum et vitam æternam consequi, &c.”—Sententia Theologorum Magn. Britan. apud Acta Synod. Dord. Artic. ii. Thes. iii. [apud Judic. Theol. Exter. pp. 78, 79. Lug. Bat. 1620.]
William Laud, “History of Troubles and Trial,” in The Works of the Most Reverend Father in God, William Laud, D.D. (Oxford: John Henry Parker, 1853), 3:304–05. For the last citation, see Anthony Milton, ed., “The Collegiat Suffrage of the Divines of Great Britaine, Concerning the Five Articles Controverted in the Low Countries,” in The British Delegation and the Synod of Dort (1618–1619) (Woodbridge, Suffolk, UK; Rochester, NY: The Boydell Press, 2005), 244–45.

Bio:
Wiki

Credit to “Anglican Zoomer” for this find.

It is interesting to see that he cites the following 12 theologians: Justin Martyr, Athanasius, Eusebius of Caesarea, Gregory of Nazianzus, Augustine, Ambrose, Chrysostom, Jerome, Primasius, Prosper of Aquitaine, Theophylact of Ohrid, and Œcumenius. Here are all of the citations in full and in order:

1. Justin Martyr (c. 90/100–165)
Chapter 95

‘Indeed, the whole human race could be said to be under a curse. For it is written in the Law laid down by Moses: “Cursed be he that abideth not in the words of the book of the Law, and fulfilleth them not in work” [Deut. 27:26. Cf. Gal. 3:10]. Not even you will dare to assert that anyone ever fulfilled all the precepts of the Law exactly; some have kept them more, some less, than others. But, if those who are subject to the Law are certainly under a curse, because they have not kept the whole Law, how much more so will all the Gentiles evidently be cursed, since they commit idolatry, seduce youths, and perform other wicked deeds? If, therefore, the Father of the Universe willed that His Christ should shoulder the curses of the whole human race, fully realizing that He would raise Him up again after His crucifixion and death, why do you accuse Him, who endured such suffering in accordance with the Father’s will, of being a cursed person, instead of bewailing your own iniquity? For, although He suffered for mankind according to the will of the Father Himself, it was not in obedience to the will of God that you made Him suffer. Nor did you practise piety when you put the Prophets to death. Nor can any of you say in self-defense: “If the [p 299] Father willed Him to suffer these things, in order that by His wounds mankind might be healed, we did no wrong [in putting Him to death].” If you would say this while you repent for your wicked actions, and acknowledge Jesus to be the Christ, and observe His precepts, then, as I said above, you will receive remission of your sins. But, if you curse Him and those who believe in Him, and, whenever it is in your power, put them to death, how will you prevent retribution from being demanded of you for having laid hands on Him, as of unjust and sinful men who are completely devoid of feeling and wisdom?’
Justin Martyr, “The Dialogue with Trypho,” in The First Apology, The Second Apology, Dialogue with Trypho, Exhortation to the Greeks, Discourse to the Greeks, The Monarchy or The Rule of God, vol. 6 of The Fathers of the Church, ed. Thomas B. Falls (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1948), 298–99; Dialogus cum Tryphone §95.

Another version:   
CHAP. XCV.—CHRIST TOOK UPON HIMSELF THE CURSE DUE TO US.

“For the whole human race will be found to be under a curse. For it is written in the law of Moses, ‘Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things that are written in the book of the law to do them’ [Deut. 27:26]. And no one has accurately done all, nor will you venture to deny this; but some more and some less than others have observed the ordinances enjoined. But if those who are under this law appear to be under a curse for not having observed all the requirements, how much more shall all the nations appear to be under a curse who practise idolatry, who seduce youths, and commit other crimes? If, then, the Father of all wished His Christ for the whole human family to take upon Him the curses of all, knowing that, after He had been crucified and was dead, He would raise Him up, why do you argue about Him, who submitted to suffer these things according to the Father’s will, as if He were accursed, and do not rather bewail yourselves? For although His Father caused Him to suffer these things in behalf of the human family, yet you did not commit the deed as in obedience to the will of God. For you did not practise piety when you slew the prophets. And let none of you say: If His Father wished Him to suffer this, in order that by His stripes the human race might be healed, we have done no wrong. If, indeed, you repent of your sins, and recognise Him to be Christ, and observe His commandments, then you may assert this; for, as I have said before, remission of sins shall be yours. But if you curse Him and them that believe on Him, and, when you have the power, put them to death, how is it possible that requisition shall not be made of you, as of unrighteous and sinful men, altogether hard-hearted and without understanding, because you laid your hands on Him?
Justin Martyr, “Dialogue of Justin with Trypho, a Jew,” in The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus, ed. Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson, and A. Cleveland Coxe, vol. 1 of The Ante-Nicene Fathers (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Company, 1885), 247; Dialogus cum Tryphone §95.

2. Athanasius (c. 296/298–373)
XXXVII. The unparalleled death of Christ

Or who of those recorded in Scripture was pierced in his hands and feet, or has been hanged at all on a tree and ended his life on a cross for the salvation of all? For Abraham died departing this life on a bed: Isaac and Jacob themselves, too, died, having gathered up their feet on a bed. Moses and Aaron died on the mountain, David in his house, suffering from no plot of the people; although, indeed, he was sought after by Saul, yet he was preserved unharmed. Isaiah was sawn asunder, but he did not hang upon a tree; Jeremiah was insulted, but was not condemned to death: Ezekiel suffered, but not on the people’s behalf, rather pointing out what should come upon the people.

Moreover, these men, even when they suffered, were men all alike in their natural similitude; but He who is pointed out by the Scriptures to suffer on behalf of all is not a mere man, but is called the Life of all, even though He was like in nature to men. For ‘Ye shall see,’ it says, ‘your Life hanging before your eyes;’ and ‘Who shall declare His generation?’ [Isa. 53:8]. For of all the saints one can learn the generation, and trace it down from of old, and whence each was born; but of Him who is the Life, the Divine words signify that the generation is untraceable.

Who then is it of whom the Divine Writings say these things? or who is so great that the prophets foreannounce such great things concerning Him? Indeed, none other is found in the Scriptures except the common Saviour of all, the Word of God, our Lord Jesus Christ. For this is He who, coming forth from the Virgin, appeared as man upon earth, having an untraceable generation according to the flesh. For there is none that can speak of His father after the flesh, His body not being from a man, but from a virgin only.

As, then, one can trace their genealogy by their fathers of David, and of Moses, and of all the patriarchs, so no one can trace the generation from a man of the Saviour according to the flesh. For this is He who made the star to signify the birth of His body; for it was right that the Word descending from heaven should have also the signification of it from heaven; and it was right that the King of Creation at His coming should be visibly recognised by all creation.

Doubtless He was born in Judæa, yet men from Persia came to worship Him. This is He who won the victory over the opposing dæmons, and trophies against idolatry, even before His bodily manifestation. All, at least, from among the nations everywhere, abjuring their ancestral custom and the godlessness of idols, are placing their hope henceforth in Christ, and registering themselves under Him, as, indeed, one can see so much with one’s eyes.

For at no other time has the godlessness of the Ægyptians ceased, except when the Lord of all, as it were ‘riding upon a cloud,’ [Isa. 19:1] went down thither in the body and brought to naught the deceit of idols, and brought over all to Himself, and to the Father through Him. This is He who was crucified before the witness of the sun and creation, and before those who led Him forth to death; and by His death salvation has come for all, and all creation has been ransomed. This is He who is the Life of all, and who, as a sheep, surrendered His own body to death for the salvation of all as a life-gift, although the Jews believe it not.
Athanasius of Alexandria, Athanasius: On the Incarnation of the Word of God, trans. T. Herbert Bindley, Second Edition Revised. (London: The Religious Tract Society, 1903), 109–111; De incarnatione §37.

Another version:   
37 Which of those borne witness to in the scriptures was pierced in his hands and feet, or was hung at all upon a tree, and completed his life on the cross for the salvation of all? Abraham died, expiring on a bed; Isaac and Jacob also died with feet raised upon a bed. Moses and Aaron on the mountain; David died in his house, without being the object of any plotting by the people. Even if he was sought by Saul, yet he was preserved unharmed. Isaiah was sawn asunder, but he was not hanged upon the wood; Jeremiah was abused, but he did not die under condemnation; Ezekiel suffered, but not for the people, but indicating what would happen to the people. Moreover, these, although suffering, were human beings, like everyone else in the similarity of nature; but he who is declared by the scriptures to suffer on behalf of all is not simply human, but is called the Life of all, even if similar in nature to human beings. “You will see,” it says, “your life hanging before your eyes” (Deut 28:66) and “Who will declare his generation?” (Isa 53:8) For one could study the generation of all the saints, to expound from of old who and whence each one was, but the generation of the one who is Life the divine words declare to be inexpressible.

Who then is this of whom the divine scriptures say these things? Or who is so great, that the prophets also foretell such things about him? For no one else is found in the scriptures except the Savior common to all, the God Word, our Lord Jesus Christ. For he it is who came forth from a virgin, and appeared on earth as a human being, and has an inexpressible generation in the flesh. For there is no one who can speak of his father in the flesh, his body not being from a man but from a virgin alone. Just as one can, therefore, trace the genealogy of David and Moses and all the patriarchs, so no one can tell of the generation in the flesh of the Savior from man. For he it is who made the star tell of the birth [genesis] of his body. For as the Word came down from heaven, it was necessary to have a sign from heaven too; and as the king of creation came forth, it was necessary that he be clearly known by the whole inhabited world. He was born in Judaea and they came from Persia to worship him. He it is who even before his bodily manifestation took the victory against the opposing demons and the trophy over idolatry. So all Gentiles from everywhere, rejecting the inherited customs and the godlessness of idols, place their hope henceforth in Christ and dedicate themselves to him, so that one can also see such things with the eyes themselves. For at no other time did the godlessness of the Egyptians cease, except when the Lord of all, riding as upon a cloud, went down there in the body, destroyed the error of the idols, and brought all to himself and through himself to the Father. He it is that was crucified, with the sun and creation as witnesses together with those who inflicted death upon him; and by his death salvation has come to all, and all creation been ransomed. He it is who is the Life of all, and who like a sheep delivered his own body to death as a substitute for the salvation of all, even if the Jews do not believe.
St Athanasius the Great of Alexandria, On the Incarnation: Translation, ed. and trans. John Behr, vol. 44a of Popular Patristics Series (Yonkers, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2011), 127–31; De incarnatione §37.

Another version:   
§ 37. Psalm 22:16, &c. Majesty of His birth and death. Confusion of oracles and demons in Egypt

Or who among those recorded in Scripture was pierced in the hands and feet, or hung at all upon a tree, and was sacrificed on a cross for the salvation of all? For Abraham died, ending his life on a bed; Isaac and Jacob also died with their feet raised on a bed; Moses and Aaron died on the mountain; David in his house, without being the object of any conspiracy at the hands of the people; true, he was pursued by Saul, but he was preserved unhurt. Esaias was sawn asunder, but not hung on a tree. Jeremy was shamefully treated, but did not die under condemnation; Ezechie suffered, not however for the people, but to indicate what was to come upon the people.

2. Again, these, even where they suffered, were men resembling all in their common nature; but he that is declared in Scripture to suffer on behalf of all is called not merely man, but the Life of all, albeit He was in fact like men in nature. For “ye shall see,” it says, “your Life hanging before your eyes;” and “who shall declare his generation?” For one can ascertain the genealogy of all the saints, and declare it from the beginning, and of whom each was born; but the generation of Him that is the Life the Scriptures refer to as not to be declared. 3. Who then is he of whom the Divine Scriptures say this? Or who is so great that even the prophets predict of him such great things? None else, now, is found in the Scriptures but the common Saviour of all, the Word of God, our Lord Jesus Christ. For He it is that proceeded from a virgin and appeared as man on the earth, and whose generation after the flesh cannot be declared. For there is none that can tell His father after the flesh, His body not being of a man, but of a virgin alone; 4. so that no one can declare the corporal generation of the Saviour from a man, in the same way as one can draw up a genealogy of David and of Moses and of all the patriarchs. For He it is that caused the star also to mark the birth of His body; since it was fit that the Word, coming down from heaven, should have His constellation also from heaven, and it was fitting that the King of Creation when He came forth should be openly recognized by all creation. 5. Why, He was born in Judæa, and men from Persia came to worship Him. He it is that even before His appearing in the body won the victory over His demon adversaries and a triumph over idolatry. All heathen at any rate from every region, abjuring their hereditary tradition and the impiety of idols, are now placing their hope in Christ, and enrolling themselves under Him, the like of which you may see with your own eyes.

6. For at no other time has the impiety of the Egyptians ceased, save when the Lord of all, riding as it were upon a cloud, came down there in the body and brought to nought the delusion of idols, and brought over all to Himself, and through Himself to the Father.

7. He it is that was crucified before the sun and all creation as witnesses, and before those who put Him to death: and by His death has salvation come to all, and all creation been ransomed. He is the Life of all, and He it is that as a sheep yielded His body to death as a substitute, for the salvation of all, even though the Jews believe it not.
Athanasius of Alexandria, “On the Incarnation of the Word,” in St. Athanasius: Select Works and Letters, ed. Philip Schaff and Henry Wace, trans. Archibald T. Robertson, vol. 4 of A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Second Series (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1892), 55–56; De incarnatione §37.

3. Eusebius of Caesarea (c. 260/265–339)
For He was the Lamb that takes away sin, according to John the Baptist, when he said: “Behold the Lamb of God, that taketh away the sin of the world” [John 1:29], and He was the Lamb led to the slaughter in the oracle of Isaiah, which said: “He was led as a sheep to the slaughter, and as a lamb before her shearers is dumb” [Isa. 53.7]. [d] And of Him as of a lamb was it said: “For the sins of my people he was led to death” [Isa. 53.8]. For it was necessary that the Lamb of God, taken by the great High-Priest on behalf of the other kindred lambs, for all the flock of mankind [πάσης τῆς ἀνθρωπίνης ἀγέλης], should be offered as a sacrifice to God: “For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead,” says the apostle: “and as by the offence of one, judgment came upon all men to condemnation: even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life” [1 Cor. 15:21; Rom. 5:18]. [463] Hence, also, He taught His disciples that He was life and light and truth, and the other conceptions of His Divinity, whereas to them that were not initiated into the secrets of His nature, He said: “Why do ye seek to kill me, a man that has told you the truth?” [John 8:40]
Eusebius of Cæsarea, The Proof of the Gospel: Being the Demonstratio Evangelica of Eusebius of Cæsarea, ed. W. J. Sparrow-Simpson and W. K. Lowther Clarke, trans. W. J. Ferrar, vol. 2 of Translations of Christian Literature: Series I: Greek Texts (London; New York: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge; The Macmillan Company, 1920), 191; Demonstratio Evangelica 10.praef.5 (PG 22, col. 718 B).

Here are a few more relevant quotes from this work by Eusebius:
[b] We must, therefore, regard the brutes as akin in kind and nature and essence to the vegetation of the earth and the plants, and conclude that those who sacrifice them commit no sin. Noah indeed was told to eat flesh, as the herb of the field.

While then the better, the great and worthy and divine sacrifice was not yet available for men, it was necessary for them by the offering of animals to pay a ransom for their own life, and this was fitly a life that represented their own nature. [c] Thus did the holy men of old, anticipating by the Holy Spirit that a holy victim, dear to God and great, would one day come for men, as the offering for the sins of the world, believing that as prophets they must perform in symbol his sacrifice, and shew forth in type what was yet to be. But when that which was perfect was come, in accordance with the predictions of the prophets, the former sacrifices ceased at once because of the better and true Sacrifice.

This Sacrifice was the Christ of God, from far distant times foretold as coming to men, to be sacrificed like a sheep for the whole human race. As Isaiah the prophet says of him: “As a sheep he was led to slaughter, and as a lamb dumb before her shearers” [Is. 53:7].
Eusebius of Cæsarea, The Proof of the Gospel: Being the Demonstratio Evangelica of Eusebius of Cæsarea, ed. W. J. Sparrow-Simpson and W. K. Lowther Clarke, trans. W. J. Ferrar, vol. 1 of Translations of Christian Literature: Series I: Greek Texts (London; New York: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge; The Macmillan Company, 1920), 56–57; Demonstratio Evangelica 1.10.
[c] His Strong One forsook Him then, because He wished Him to go unto death, even “the death of the cross” [Phil. 2:8], and to be set forth as the ransom and sacrifice for the whole world, and to be the purification of the life of them that believe in Him. [d] And He, since he understood at once His Father’s Divine counsel, and because He discerned better than any other why He was forsaken by the Father, humbled Himself even more, and embraced death for us with all willingness, and “became a curse for us” [Gal. 3:13], holy and all blessed though He was, and “He that knew no sin, became sin, that we might become the righteousness of God in* Him” [2 Cor. 5:21]. Yea more—to wash away our sins He was crucified, suffering what we who were sinful should have suffered, as our sacrifice and ransom, so that we may well say with the prophet, He bears our sins, and is pained for us, and he was wounded for our sins, and bruised for our iniquities, so that by His stripes we might be healed, for the Lord hath given Him for our sins [Isa. 53:4]. So, as delivered up by the Father, as bruised, as bearing our sins, He was led as a sheep to the slaughter. With this the apostle agrees when he says, “Who spared not his own Son, but delivered him for us all” [Rom. 8:32]. And it is to impel us to ask why the Father forsook Him, that He says, “Why hast thou forsaken me?” [496] The answer is, to ransom the whole human race, buying them with His precious Blood from their former slavery to their invisible tyrants, the unclean dæmons, and the rulers and spirits of evil.

And the Father forsook Him for another reason, namely, that the love of Christ Himself for men might be set forth.
Eusebius of Cæsarea, The Proof of the Gospel: Being the Demonstratio Evangelica of Eusebius of Cæsarea, ed. W. J. Sparrow-Simpson and W. K. Lowther Clarke, trans. W. J. Ferrar, vol. 2 of Translations of Christian Literature: Series I: Greek Texts (London; New York: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge; The Macmillan Company, 1920), 220–21; Demonstratio Evangelica 10.8.

4. Gregory of Nazianzus (c. 329–390)

Laud lists the following as Orat. 42 (according to Opera, tom. i. p. 696. D. Paris. 1630), as some others do as well, but in some modern versions, as in the following, it is Orat. 45.
XXIX. Many indeed are the miracles of that time: God crucified; the sun darkened and again rekindled; for it was fitting that the creatures should suffer with their Creator; the veil rent; the Blood and Water shed from His Side; the one as from a man, the other as above man; the rocks rent for the Rock’s sake; the dead raised for a pledge of the final Resurrection of all men; the Signs at the Sepulchre and after the Sepulchre, which none can worthily celebrate; and yet none of these equal to the Miracle of my salvation. A few drops of Blood recreate the whole world [ρανιδες αἱματος ὀλιγαι κοσμον ὁλον ἀναπλαττουσαι], and become to all men what rennet is to milk, drawing us together and compressing us into unity.
Gregory Nazianzen, “Select Orations of Saint Gregory Nazianzen,” in S. Cyril of Jerusalem, S. Gregory Nazianzen, ed. Philip Schaff and Henry Wace, trans. Charles Gordon Browne and James Edward Swallow, vol. 7 of A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Second Series (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1894), 433; Orat. 45.29.

Another version:   
29 Many indeed are the wonders of that time: God crucified; the sun darkened and again rekindled, for created things also had to suffer with the Creator; the veil split; blood and water pouring from his side, the first as human, the second as above the human; the earth shaken, rocks broken in pieces for the sake of the Rock; dead people raised to bring faith in the completion of the universal resurrection; the signs at the tomb and after the tomb. Who can adequately sing their praise? Yet none is like the wonder of my salvation: a few drops of blood recreate the whole world and become for all human beings like a curdling agent for milk, binding and drawing us together into one.
St Gregory of Nazianzus, Festal Orations, ed. John Behr, trans. Nonna Verna Harrison, vol. 36 of Popular Patristics Series (Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2008), 189; Orat. 45.29 (PG 36, col. 663 A).

5. Augustine of Hippo (354–430)
More to be feared he is indeed than all the gods. The place where he intends to build his house is thickly forested, which is why we heard in yesterday’s psalm, We found it in the pastures and woodlands (Ps 131(132):6). It was this same house that was being sought when the psalm spoke of pastures and woodlands. Why was the place forested? Men and women were worshipping idols, so it is small wonder that they were feeding pigs. There was once a son who forsook his father, and ran through all his money by extravagant living and frequenting prostitutes. He ended by feeding pigs [See Lk 15:13–15], which is a way of saying that he paid cult to demons. Through the superstition prevalent among the Gentiles the whole earth had become a thick wood. But the Lord who builds his house uprooted the forest, and this is why our psalm is entitled, When the house was being built after the captivity; for people certainly had been held captive under the devil, and had served demons, but they were redeemed from captivity. They had the power to sell themselves, but were powerless to buy themselves back. The redeemer came, and laid down the price. He poured out his blood and purchased the whole round world. Are you asking what he bought? Look what he paid, and from that infer what he bought. The price paid was Christ’s blood. What is worth a price like that? What else but the entire world? What else but all nations? When certain people maintain either that the price was so low that it purchased Africans only, or that they are themselves so important that so high a price was justly paid for them alone, they are either shockingly ungrateful for the generosity that ransomed them, or else exceedingly proud. Let them not triumph [Variant: “insult us”], and let them not be arrogant; whatever Christ spent, he spent for all the world. He knows what he has bought, and he knows what he paid for it.
Saint Augustine, Expositions of the Psalms 73–98, ed. John E. Rotelle, trans. Maria Boulding, vol. 18 of The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century (Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 2002), 428–29.

Another version:   
5. … For the spot where he wished to build the house, is itself woody, where it was said yesterday, “we found it in the wood” [Ps. 132:6. Hence it appears that Ps. 132 had been expounded the day before]. For he was seeking that very house, when he said, “in the wood.” And why is that spot woody? Men used to worship images: it is not wonderful that they fed hogs. For that son who left his father, and spent his all on harlots, living as a prodigal, used to feed hogs [Luke 15:12–15], that is, to worship devils; and by this very superstition of the heathen, all the earth became a wood. But he who buildeth a house, rooteth up the wood; and for this reason it was said, “While the house was being built, after the captivity” [Title of Psalm]. For men were held captive under the devil, and served devils; but they were redeemed from captivity. They could sell, but they could not redeem themselves. The Redeemer came, and gave a price; He poured forth His Blood, and bought the whole world. Ye ask what He bought? Ye see what He hath given; find out then what He bought. The Blood of Christ was the price. What is equal to this? What, but the whole world? What, but all nations? They are very ungrateful for their price, or very proud, who say that the price is so small that it bought the Africans only; or that they are so great, as that it was given for them alone. Let them not then exult, let them not be proud: He gave what He gave for the whole world. He knew what He bought, because He knew at what price He bought it. Thus because we are redeemed, the house is built after the captivity. And who are they who held us in captivity? Because they to whom it is said, “Declare His honour,” are the clearers of the wood: that they may root out the wood, free the earth from captivity, and build, and raise up, by declaring the greatness of the Lord’s house. How is the wood of devils cleared away, unless He who is above them all be preached? All nations then had devils for their gods: those whom they called gods, were devils, as the Apostle more openly saith, “The things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice unto devils, and not to God” [1 Cor. 10:20]. Since therefore they were in captivity, because they sacrificed to devils, and on that account the whole earth had remained woody; He is declared to be great, and above all worldly praise.
Augustine of Hippo, “Expositions on the Book of Psalms,” in Saint Augustin: Expositions on the Book of Psalms, ed. Philip Schaff, trans. A. Cleveland Coxe, vol. 8 of A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, First Series (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1888), 471–72.

6. Ambrose of Milan (c. 339–397)

De paradisio:
(39) Possible objections on the part of the Gentiles who do not admit this evidence stand in need of a response. Since the Gentiles demand a rational explanation, here is the reason why the Son of God either gave a command to one who is going to disobey it or has chosen one who is going to betray Him. The Lord Jesus came to save all sinners [Cf. Luke 19:10]. He was bound to show concern even for the wicked. Accordingly, He was bound not to disregard one who was to betray Him. He wished that all might take note that in the choice even of His betrayer He was offering a sign for the salvation of all of us. No injury was done to Adam in that he received a command, or to Judas because he was chosen. God did not lay it down as a necessary consequence that one should disobey and the other should betray Him. Both could have abstained from sin if they had guarded what they had received. Hence, although He knew that all the Jews would not believe, He stated: ‘I have not come except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel’ [Matt. 15:24] The fault is, therefore, not in the one issuing the command; the sin is rather in the one who disobeys. God’s intent was this: He wanted to show to everyone that He willed to give freedom to all mankind. I do not mean to maintain that He did not know of the disobedience to come. Rather, I contend that He did know, but that He should not for that reason be subject to reproach for a betrayer who met death. God should not be accused of being the cause why both lapsed. In fact, both stand convicted and condemned, because one received a command not to fall into sin, and the other was enrolled among the Apostles in order that he, as the result of kindness, might change his intention to betray.
Ambrose of Milan, Hexameron, Paradise, and Cain and Abel, trans. John J. Savage, vol. 42 of The Fathers of the Church (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1961), 316–17; De paradisio 8.39.

De Cain et Abel:   
(11) Our price is the blood of Christ. Hence the Apostle Peter says: ‘Not with gold or silver you were redeemed, but with the precious blood.’ And Paul says: ‘You have been bought with a price. Do not become the slaves of men’ [1 Peter 1:18; 1 Cor. 7:23]. Therefore, not without reason did they marvel in the Gospel on seeing the Lord Jesus sitting on a colt, because the race of the Gentiles is to Christ like a victim which, according to the Law, is considered to be unclean. Hence we read in the Scriptures that the Levites redeemed them [Cf. Exod. 13:13]. In this way they would be able by the sanctity of their lives and by their prayers to take away the sins of their people. Here in the figure of the Lamb we have the true Levite who was to come and preside over the mysteries. By His own Passion He would take away the sins of the world [Cf. John 1:29]. The word ‘Levite’ means ‘raised up for me’ or ‘on me he is light.’ The word ‘Levite’ bears witness to a perfection in virtue by which the people attain holiness. He, therefore, is the expected who was born of a virgin and who came for my salvation and for the salvation of the entire world. For me He was sacrificed; for me He tasted death; and for me, too, He rose from the dead. In Him has the redemption of all men been undertaken; in Him is their resurrection. He is the true Levite. We, His Levites, He would bring closer to God so that we might pray to Him unceasingly, hope for salvation from Him, shun all worldly affairs, and finally be numbered among the elect, as it is written: ‘O Lord, possess us’ [Exod. 34:9]. Then alone is found true possession when we are not subject to the temptations of life and when we bring forth perfect fruit for all time. The Levite is one who redeems, because a man of wisdom redeems the man who is weak and foolish. He is like a physician who revives the spirit of his helpless patient. In imitation of that Physician who came down from heaven, he assuages the convalescent with healing words of wisdom, in order to point out to men the ways of wisdom and to reveal the paths of wisdom to little ones [Cf. Ps. 18:8; Matt. 11:25]. He perceived that those who suffer cannot be healed without a remedy. For this reason He bestowed medicine on the sick and by His assistance made health available to all, so that whoever died could ascribe to himself the real causes of his death. That man was unwilling to be cured, although he had a remedy at hand which could effect his escape from death. The mercy of God has been made manifest to all. Those who perish, therefore, perish through their own negligence, whereas those who are saved are freed by the judgment of God, who wishes all men to be saved and to come to the recognition of truth [Cf. John 3:16–21; Luke 19:10]. Hence, if Sodom had fifty just men, it would not have been destroyed. If it had ten just men, Sodom would have been saved [Cf. Gen. 18:24–32], because a declaration of the remission of sin would have rescued their souls from servitude, and the plenitude of perfect knowledge would not have allowed their hearts to be consumed in the devouring flames of lust.
Ambrose of Milan, Hexameron, Paradise, and Cain and Abel, trans. John J. Savage, vol. 42 of The Fathers of the Church (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1961), 411–13; De Cain et Abel 2.3.11.

7. John Chrysostom (c. 347–407)
Ver. 4. Who will have all men to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the truth.

Imitate God! (2) if He will have all men to be saved, there is reason why one should pray for all, if He hath willed that all should be saved, be thou willing also; and if thou wishest it, pray for it, for wishes lead to prayers. Observe how from every quarter He urges this upon the soul, to pray for the Heathen, shewing how great advantage springs from it; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life; and what is much more than this, that it is pleasing to God, that thus men become like Him, in that they will the same that He does. This is enough to shame a very brute. Fear not therefore to pray for the Gentiles, for God Himself wills it; but fear only to pray against any, for that He wills not. And if you pray for the Heathens, you ought of course to pray for Heretics also, for we are to pray for all men, and not to persecute. And this is good also for another reason, as we are partakers of the same nature, and God commands and accepts benevolence and affection towards one another.

But if the Lord Himself wills to give, you say, what need of my prayer? It is of great benefit both to them and to thyself. It draws them to love, and it inclines thee to humanity. It has the power of attracting others to the faith; (for many men have fallen away from God, from contentiousness towards one another;) and this is what he now calls the salvation of God, who will have all men to be saved; without this all other is nothing great, a mere nominal salvation, and only in words. And to come to the knowledge of the truth. The truth: what truth? Faith in Him. And indeed he had previously said, Charge some that they teach no other doctrine. But that no one may consider such as enemies, and on that account raise troubles [μάχας] against them; he says that He will have all men to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the truth; and having said this, he adds,

Ver. 5. For there is one God, and one Mediator between God and men.

He had before said, to come to the knowledge of the truth, implying that the world is not in the truth. Now he says, that there is one God, that is, not as some say, many, and that He has sent His Son as Mediator, thus giving proof that He will have all men to be saved. But is not the Son God? Most truly He is; why then does he say, One God? In contradistinction to the idols; not to the Son. For he is discoursing about truth and error. Now a mediator ought to have communion with both parties, between whom he is to mediate. For this is the property of a mediator, to be in close communion with each of those whose mediator he is. For he would be no longer a mediator, if he were connected with one but separated from the other. If therefore He partakes not of the nature of the Father, He is not a Mediator, but is separated. For as He is partaker of the nature of men, because He came to men, so is He partaker of the nature of God, because He came from God. Because He was to mediate between two natures, He must approximate to the two natures; for as the place situated between two others is joined to each place, so must that between natures be joined to either nature. As therefore He became Man, so was He also God. A man could not have become a mediator, because he must also plead with God. God could not have been mediator, since those could not receive Him, toward whom He should have mediated. And as elsewhere he says, There is one God the Father, … and one Lord Jesus Christ [1 Cor. 8:6]; so also here One God, and One Mediator; he does not say two; for he would not have that number wrested to Polytheism, of which he was speaking. So he wrote One and One. You see how accurate are the expressions of Scripture! For though one and one are two, we are not to say this, though reason suggests it. And here thou sayest not one and one are two, and yet thou sayest what reason does not suggest. ‘If He begat He also suffered [ἔπαθεν].’ For there is one God, he says, and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus.

Ver. 6. Who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified [Lit. the Testimony] in due time.

Was Christ then a ransom for the Heathen? Undoubtedly Christ died even for Heathen; and you cannot bear to pray for them. Why then, you ask, did they not believe? Because they would not: but His part was done. His suffering was a Testimony, he says; for He came, it is meant, to bear witness to the truth of the Father, and was slain [He seems to mean, ‘was slain for that purpose’]. Thus not only the Father bore witness to Him, but He to the Father. For I came [John 5:43], He saith, in my Father’s name. And again, No man hath seen God at any time [John 1:18]. And again, That they might know Thee [John 17:3], the only true God. And, God is a Spirit. And He bore witness even to the death. But this, in due time [John 4:24], means, In the fittest time.

Ver. 7. Whereunto I am ordained a preacher and an Apostle, (I speak the truth in Christ, and lie not:) a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and verity.

Since therefore Christ suffered for the Gentiles, (3) and I was separated to be a teacher of the Gentiles, why dost thou refuse to pray for them? He fully shews his own credibility, by saying that he was ordained [Acts 13:2], that is, separated, for this purpose, the other Apostles being backward [ἐνάρκων] in teaching the Gentiles; he adds, in faith and verity, to shew that in that faith there was no deceit. Here is observable the extension of grace. For the Jews had no prayers for the Gentiles; but now grace is extended to them: and when he says that he was separated to be a Teacher of the Gentiles, he intimates that grace was now shed over every part of the world.

Moral. He gave himself a ransom, he saith, how then was He delivered up by the Father? Because it was of His goodness. And what means ransom? God was about to punish them, but He forbore to do it. They were about to perish, but in their stead He gave His own Son, and sent us as heralds to proclaim the Cross. These things are sufficient to attract all, and to demonstrate the love of Christ. So truly, so inexpressibly great are the benefits which God has bestowed upon us. He sacrificed Himself for His enemies, who hated and rejected Him. What no one would do for friends, for brethren, for children, that the Lord hath done for His servants; a Lord not Himself such an one as His servants, but God for men; for men not deserving. For had they been deserving, had they done His pleasure, it would have been less wonderful; but that He died for such ungrateful, such obstinate creatures, this it is which strikes every mind with amazement. For what men would not do for their fellow men, that has God done for us! Yet after such a display of love towards us, we hold back [ἀκκιζόμεθα], and are not in earnest in our love of Christ. He has sacrificed Himself for us; for Him we make no sacrifice. We neglect Him when He wants necessary food; sick and naked we visit Him not. What do we not deserve, what wrath, what punishment, what hell? Were there no other inducement, it should be sufficient to prevail with every one that He condescended to make human sufferings His own, to say I hunger, I thirst.
John Chrysostom, “Homilies of S. John Chrysostom, Archbishop of Constantinople, on the First Epistle of S. Paul the Apostle to Timothy,” in The Homilies of S. John Chrysostom, Archbishop of Constantinople, on the Epistles of St. Paul the Apostle to Timothy, Titus, and Philemon, A Library of Fathers of the Holy Catholic Church (Oxford; London: John Henry Parker; J. G. F. and J. Rivington, 1843), 56–59. See also John Chrysostom, “Homilies of St. John Chrysostom, Archbishop of Constantinople, on the First Epistle of St. Paul the Apostle to Timothy,” in Saint Chrysostom: Homilies on Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, Thessalonians, Timothy, Titus, and Philemon, ed. Philip Schaff, trans. James Tweed and Philip Schaff, vol. 13 of A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, First Series (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1889), 430–31; and Chrysostom, In epist. 1 ad Timoth. Cap. II. Homil. VII. (PG 62, col. 537).

8. Jerome (c. 342/347–420)
Qui dedit redemptionem semetipsum pro omnibus. Ille se pro omnibus dedit, si omnes redimi vellent.

AI Translation: Who gave himself as a redemption for all. He gave himself for all, if all were willing to be redeemed.
Jerome, Commentarius in epistolam I ad Timotheum. Cap. II (PL 30, col. 878 A). Or see here (click).

9. Primasius of Hadrumetum (fl. 551–died c. 560)
Qui dedit redemptionem semetipsum pro omnibus. Pro omnibus quidem effuses est sanguis Christi, sed credentibus prodest: incredulis vero erit in condemnationem: sicut alibi decit, Aliis sumus odor vitae in vitam: aliis odor mortis in mortem.

AI Translation: Who gave Himself as a redemption for all. For the blood of Christ was indeed poured out for all; but it benefits believers, whereas for unbelievers it will be unto condemnation: just as He Himself says elsewhere, “To some we are the fragrance of life unto life; to others the fragrance of death unto death.”
Primasius, In epistolam I ad Timotheum commentaria (PL 68, col. 663 C).

10. Prosper of Aquitaine (c. 390–c. 455)
CAPUT XVI. Quod Christus pro omnibus impiis mortuus sit. Nulla igitur ratio dubitandi est, Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum pro impiis et peccatoribus mortuum, a quorum numero si aliquis liber inventus est, non est pro omnibus mortuus Christus: sed prorsus pro omnibus mortuus est Christus:
Prosper, De vocatione omnium gentium Liber II (PL 51, col. 702–703 D–A).
There can, therefore, be no reason to doubt that Jesus Christ our Lord died for the unbelievers and the sinners.140 If there had been any one who did not belong to these, then Christ would not have died for all. But He did die for all men without exception.
_______________
140 The Semi-Pelagians wrongly concluded from St. Augustine’s teaching on predestination that Christ did not die for all men, but only for the predestined. Cf. Prosper’s answer in Resp. cap. Vincent. 1 and Resp. cap. Gall. 9.
St. Prosper of Aquitaine, St. Prosper of Aquitaine: The Call of All Nations, ed. Johannes Quasten and Joseph C. Plumpe, trans. P. De Letter, vol. 14 of Ancient Christian Writers (New York; Ramsey, NJ: Newman Press, 1952), 118.

11. Theophylact of Ohrid (c. 1055–c. 1107)
Ut gratia Dei pro omnibus gustaret mortem. Deus enim non ex debito, sed ex gratia Filium suum nobis dedit in mortem, non pro fidelibus tantum, sed pro universo terrarum orbe. Etsi enim omnes non sunt servati, ipse tamen quod sui officii erat implevit.

“That by the grace of God He might taste death for all.” For God did not give His Son over to death for us out of debt, but out of grace—not for the faithful only, but for the whole circle of the world. For although not all are saved, He nevertheless fulfilled what belonged to His office.
Theophylact, Expositio in epist. ad Hebraeos (PG 125, col. 210 B).

12. [Pseudo-] Œcumenius (c.550–c.600)
Pro universo orbe gustaret mortem. Quanquam enim non omnes salvi facti sint ob suam incredulitatem: ipse tamen quod suum erat ad omnes et pro omnibus fecit.

AI Translation: He might taste death for the whole world. For although not all are saved because of their own unbelief, He nevertheless did what was His part for all and on behalf of all.
Oecumenius, Commentaria in Novum Testamentum. (Continuatio.): Pauli Apostoli ad Hebraeos epistola (PG 119, col. 295 C).

May 18, 2025

An Analysis of Gustav Friedrich Wiggers’s (1777–1860) View of Augustine on the Extent of Redemption

In the near future, this post will analyze Wiggers’s view of Augustine on the extent of redemption. He argued that Augustine held to “limited atonement.” For now I need to post this incomplete material in order to just have a working link for a footnote in someone else’s book that will soon be published. I will complete this post later.

Outline:

1. A Brief Biographical Sketch
2. His Claims About Augustine on the Extent of Redemption

    2.1. De Cor et Gr. 11 (De correptione et gratia)
           2.1.1 Wiggers’s Claim
           2.1.2. The Primary Sources
           2.1.3. An Analysis of Wiggers’s Claim
    2.2. On Adulterous Marriages, c. 15
           2.2.1. Wiggers’s Claim
           2.2.2. The Primary Source
           2.2.3. An Analysis of Wiggers’s Claim
    2.3. Hom. 48 on John’s Gospel
           2.3.1. Wiggers’s Claim
           2.3.2. The Primary and Secondary Sources
           2.3.3. An Analysis of Wiggers’s Claim
    2.4. Ep. 169, c. 1
           2.4.1. Wiggers’s Claim
           2.4.2. The Primary Sources
           2.4.3. An Analysis of Wiggers’s Claim
    2.5. De Trin. IV, 13
           2.5.1. Wiggers’s Claim
           2.5.2. The Primary Sources
           2.5.3. An Analysis of Wiggers’s Claim
    2.6. De Cor. et Gr. 15 (De correptione et gratia)
           2.6.1. Wiggers’s Claim
           2.6.2. The Primary Sources
           2.6.3. An Analysis of Wiggers’s Claim
    2.7 An Analysis of Other Miscellaneous Claims

3. Conclusion

1. A Brief Biographical Sketch

Gustav Adam Friedrich Wiggers (AD 1777–1860) was a German Protestant theologian and university professor at the University of Rostock. In 1821, his main work, Attempt at a pragmatic representation of Augustinism and Pelagianism according to historical development („Versuch einer pragmatischen Darstellung des Augustinismus und Pelagianismus nach der geschichtlichen Entwicklung“ In zwei Theilen. Hamburg 1833), was published. It covers the period from the beginning of the Pelagian disputes to the third ecumenical synod and was translated into English in 1840 by Ralph Emerson, professor of church history at the theological seminary in Andover in Massachusetts.

2. His Claims About Augustine on the Extent of Redemption

To read the following material in English, see Gustav Friedrich Wiggers, An Historical Presentation of Augustinianism and Pelagianism from the Original Sources, trans. Ralph Emerson (Andover; New York: Gould, Newman, & Saxton, 1840), 254–55. Or see here (click).

Wiggers claimed that Augustine held a strict view of Christ’s redemption. He observed that “Augustine’s doctrine of redemption … stands in close connection with his theory of predestination.” There is truth to that, of course, but the limitation is in the application of redemption (or redemption applied), not in the extent of its accomplishment (or redemption accomplished). Failure to make this distinction leads Wiggers astray. This is why he conflated these two categories and asserted that, according to Augustine, “Christ’s redemption could extend only to those whom God had destined to salvation. For the rest, his death even, as well as his whole incarnation, had no object. Christ therefore died and rose again only for the elect.”

Wiggers did not bother to address how many texts in Augustine go against his theory, or any of those Augustinians who argued otherwise (e.g., John Davenant and Richard Baxter), but only gave six instances where he thinks Augustine’s limited view is “peculiarly clear,” indeed, “clear as the sun.” We shall examine these citations in order.

2.1. De Cor et Gr. 11 (De correptione et gratia):

First, Wiggers cited Augustine’s work On Rebuke and Grace.

2.1.1. Wiggers’s Claim:

He wrote,
According to Augustine, therefore, redemption was not universal. God sent his Son into the world, not to redeem the whole sinful race of man, but only the elect. “By this mediator, God showed, that those whom he redeemed by his blood, he makes, from being evil, to be eternally good.” De Cor. et Gr. 11.
Wiggers, An Historical Presentation of Augustinianism and Pelagianism from the Original Sources, 254.

2.1.2. The Primary Sources:  

One Latin version says this:
Neque enim metuendum erat, ne isto ineffabili modo in unitatem personae a Verbo Deo natura humana suscepta, per liberum voluntatis peccaret arbitrium, cum ipsa susceptio talis esset, ut natura hominis a Deo ita suscepta, nullum in se motum malae voluntatis admitteret. Per hunc Mediatorem Deus ostendit eos, quos ejus sanguine redemit, facere se ex malis deinceps in aeternum bonos, quem sic suscepit, ut nunquam esset malus, nec ex malo factus semper esset bonus.
The Wallis translation has this:
That nativity, absolutely gratuitous, conjoined, in the unity of the person, man to God, flesh to the Word! Good works followed that nativity; good works did not merit it. For it was in no wise to be feared that the human nature taken up by God the Word in that ineffable manner into a unity of person, would sin by free choice of will, since that taking up itself was such that the nature of man so taken up by God would admit into itself no movement of an evil will. Through this Mediator God makes known that He makes those whom He redeemed by His blood from evil, everlastingly good; and Him He in such wise assumed that He never would be evil, and, not being made out of evil, would always be good.4
_______________
4 Some editions have, instead of “and not being made,” etc., “lest being made of evil he should not always be good.”
Augustine of Hippo, “A Treatise on Rebuke and Grace,” in Saint Augustin: Anti-Pelagian Writings, ed. Philip Schaff, trans. Robert Ernest Wallis, vol. 5 of A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, First Series (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1887), 484 (c. 30 [XI).

The more recent Teske translation has this:
This birth which was, of course, gratuitous united man to God, the flesh to the Word, in the unity of the person. Good works followed upon this birth; good works did not merit it. For there was no reason to fear that the human nature assumed in this ineffable way into the unity of the person by God the Word would sin by free choice of the will. This assumption, after all, was such that the nature of the man assumed by God in that way would admit in itself no impulse of an evil will. Through this mediator God has shown that he transforms those whom he redeemed by his blood from evil persons into persons who will thereafter be good for eternity, for he assumed this mediator in such a way that he never was evil and that he never became good after being evil.
Saint Augustine, “Rebuke and Grace,” in Answer to the Pelagians, IV, ed. John E. Rotelle, trans. Roland J. Teske, vol. 26 of The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century (Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 1999), 75; De correptione et gratia, 11.30.

2.1.3. An Analysis of Wiggers’s Claim:

Response coming soon.

2.2. On Adulterous Marriages, c. 15:

Second, Wiggers cited Augustine’s work On Adulterous Marriages.

2.2.1. Wiggers’s Claim:

Wiggers wrote:
The following passage is peculiarly clear, and is taken from the first book “on adulterous marriages,” C. 15, a work written about the year 419, and not directed against the Pelagians. “Every one that has been redeemed by the blood of Christ, is a man; though not every one that is a man, has been redeemed by the blood of Christ.”
Wiggers, An Historical Presentation of Augustinianism and Pelagianism from the Original Sources, 254.

2.2.2. The Primary Source:
Chapter 15

(16) However, it cannot be said of those actions which are included here, and which are not expedient, although lawful, that this action is good, but that one is better in the same way that it has been written that ‘He who gives her in marriage does well, and he who does not give her does better’ [1 Cor. 7:38]. For, in this second instance, both courses are lawful, although, at times, the one may be expedient, at times, the other. Doubtlessly, those who cannot remain chaste should marry. This is expedient because it is lawful. For those, however, who have vowed to remain continent, it is neither lawful nor expedient to marry. As a matter of fact, one may lawfully separate from an unbeliever, but it is not expedient. However, if the spouse consents to cohabitate, it is both lawful and expedient to remain with him, because if it were not lawful, it could not be expedient. Therefore, an action can be lawful and not expedient, but what is unlawful cannot be expedient, because not everything that is lawful is also expedient, but everything that is unlawful is inexpedient. For, it is certain that everyone who has been redeemed by the Blood of Christ belongs to the human race; nevertheless, it is likewise true that not every human person has been redeemed by the Blood of Christ. It is just as true that everything that is not lawful is also inexpedient; but, not everything that is inexpedient is likewise unlawful. Certainly, then, there are lawful acts which are inexpedient, just as we have learned from the testimony of the Apostle.
Augustine of Hippo, “Adulterous Marriages,” in Treatises on Marriage and Other Subjects, ed. Roy Joseph Deferrari, trans. Charles T. Huegelmeyer, vol. 27 of The Fathers of the Church (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1955), 81; B. 1, c. 15.

2.2.3. An Analysis of Wiggers’s Claim:

Response coming soon.

2.3. Hom. 48 on John’s Gospel:

Third, Wiggers cited Augustine’s 48th Homilies on the Gospel of John.

2.3.1. Wiggers’s Claim:

Wiggers wrote:
Hence the words in John 10:26, ye believe not because ye are not of my sheep, according to Hom. 48. on John’s gospel, mean as much as this, Ye believe not, because ye are not bought for eternal life by my blood.
Wiggers, An Historical Presentation of Augustinianism and Pelagianism from the Original Sources, 254–55.

Others have also appealed to this passage to maintain that Augustine taught a stricter view of Christ’s redemption, such as Gottschalk, Ratramnus, Remigius, and recently Raymond A. (Randy) Blacketer.

2.3.2. The Primary and Secondary Sources:

Latin Text:
Quia videbat eos ad sempiternum interitum praedestinatos, non ad vitam aeternam sui sanguinis pretio comparatos.
From Augustinus.it and the Catholic Library.
4. This, as a great matter, the Jews enquired of Christ; in order that if He should say, I am Christ, then, upon the conception which alone they entertained of the Seed of David, they might accuse Him of arrogating to Himself kingly power. What He told them in reply is more than that: they wished to make matter of accusation out of the Son of David: He told them that He was the Son of God. And how? Hear (v. 25, 26). Jesus answered them, I tell you, and ye believe not: the works that I do in My Father’s Name, they bear witness of Me. But ye believe not, because ye are not of My sheep. Ye have already learned above which are the sheep. Be ye sheep. Sheep are such in believing, sheep in following the Shepherd, sheep in not despising the Redeemer, sheep in entering in by the door, sheep in going out and finding pasture, sheep in enjoying eternal life. How then said He to these, Ye are not of My sheep? Because He saw them predestinated to everlasting destruction, not purchased (comparatos; See Note A, at the end of the volume) by the price of His blood unto eternal life.
S. Augustine, “Homily XLVIII (John 10:22–42), in Homilies on the Gospel according to St. John, and His First Epistle: Hom. 1–124, S. John 1–21 and Hom. 1–10, 1 S. John, vol. 1 & 2 of A Library of Fathers of the Holy Catholic Church, Anterior to the Division of the East and West: Translated by Members of the English Church (Oxford; London: John Henry Parker; F. and J. Rivington, 1848–1849), 639; Hom. 48.4; italics original.
4. The Jews asked this of Christ for an important reason, so that if he said, “I am the Christ,” they would, according to the little that they knew about the seed of David, accuse him of claiming royal power for himself. His answer to them went further. They wanted to make a false charge about the son of David; he said that he was the Son of God. And how? Listen: Jesus answered them, I tell you, and you do not believe. The works that I do in the name of my Father, these bear witness to me, but you do not believe, because you are not of my sheep. (Jn 10:25–26) You already learned earlier on who the sheep are (See Homily 45, 9–15). Be sheep! The sheep are such by believing, the sheep are such by following the shepherd, the sheep are such by not disdaining the Redeemer, the sheep are such by going in through the gate, the sheep are such by going out and finding pasture, the sheep are such by enjoying eternal life. Why, then, did he say to them, You are not of my sheep (Jn 10:26)? Because he saw that they were predestined to eternal destruction,17 not bought for eternal life at the price of his blood.
_______________
17 At this point in Augustine’s career, “predestination” means God’s foreknowledge (and not God’s predestining anyone to damnation), as it also does in section 6. See Homilies 42, 16; 45, 12–13; 48, 6.
Saint Augustine, Homilies on the Gospel of John 41–124, ed. Allan D. Fitzgerald and Boniface Ramsey, trans. Edmund Hill, vol. 13 of The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century (Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 2020), 99–100.
4. The Jews were seeking this from Christ as an important matter, so that if he were to say, I am the Christ, as far as they understood [him] to be only of the seed of David, they would falsely accuse him of claiming royal power for himself. What he answered them is more; they wanted to accuse him as the son of David. He answered that he was the Son of God. And how? Listen. “Jesus answered them, ‘I speak to you and you do not believe. The works which I do in my Father’s name, these give testimony concerning me. But you do not believe because you are not of my sheep.’ ” You have already earlier learned who the sheep are (Cf. Tractate 45:9–13). Be sheep! By believing they are sheep, by following the Shepherd they are sheep, by not despising the Redeemer they are sheep, by going in through the gate they are sheep, by going out and finding pasture they are sheep, by enjoying eternal life they are sheep. How then did he say to these, “You are not of my sheep”? Because he saw that they were predestined for eternal destruction, not purchased at the price of his blood for eternal life.12
_______________
12 That God foreknows that some are condemned poses a theological problem in view of the orthodox teaching that Christ died for all and by his death and resurrection redeemed all. As in all matters touching predestination, Augustine’s view is complex, difficult, and somewhat obscure. It would appear that he holds that God does will the salvation of all men and in a general sense he does so by providing all with the power and the means for salvation. But he also, for his own reasons, gives men the freedom to choose or refuse salvation and then he foreknows that some will choose salvation and some damnation. He could intervene, but wills not to do so; were he to intervene freedom of will would be meaningless. Since he foreknows that some will refuse redemption and does not intervene, then in an absolute sense he wills the damnation of some. Why he chooses this kind of world over the many possible dispositions of creation is a mystery. See Browne, 29.1238–46, and E. Portalie, A Guide to the Thought of Saint Augustine, 215–23. But the situation is probably more complex than this, as all men’s acts are the results of freely given, unmerited graces. Why are some not given graces to enable their perseverance? Augustine, then, would seem to take a rather rigid view of predestination: that God, for his own reasons, in fact wills the damnation of some. This tractate seems to support such a view. See J. Kelly, Early Christian Doctrine, 366–69, for a good, brief account of the latter position.
Augustine of Hippo, Tractates on the Gospel of John 28–54, ed. Thomas P. Halton, trans. John W. Rettig, vol. 88 of The Fathers of the Church (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1993), 230; In Evangelium Iohannis tractatus, 48.4.
4. The Jews made this inquiry of Christ, chiefly in order that, should He say, I am Christ, they might, in accordance with the only sense they attached to such a name, that He was of the seed of David, calumniate Him with aiming at the kingly power. There is more than this in His answer to them: they wished to calumniate Him with claiming to be the Son of David. He replied that He was the Son of God. And how? Listen: “Jesus answered them, I tell you, and ye believe not: the works that I do in my Father’s name, they bear witness of me: but ye believe not; because ye are not of my sheep.” Ye have already learned above (in Lecture XLV.) who the sheep are: be ye sheep. They are sheep through believing, sheep in following the Shepherd, sheep in not despising their Redeemer, sheep in entering by the door, sheep in going out and finding pasture, sheep in the enjoyment of eternal life. What did He mean, then, in saying to them, “Ye are not of my sheep”? That He saw them predestined to everlasting destruction, not won to eternal life by the price of His own blood.
Augustine of Hippo, “Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel according to St. John,” in St. Augustin: Homilies on the Gospel of John, Homilies on the First Epistle of John, Soliloquies, ed. Philip Schaff, trans. John Gibb and James Innes, vol. 7 of A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, First Series (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1888), 266–267; Tractate 48.4.

I asked several Latinists online what they thought was the best out of the four following English translations:
  1. “Because He saw them predestinated to everlasting destruction, not purchased by the price of His blood unto eternal life.”
  2. “Because he saw that they were predestined to eternal destruction, not bought for eternal life at the price of his blood.”
  3. “Because he saw that they were predestined for eternal destruction, not purchased at the price of his blood for eternal life.”
  4. “That He saw them predestined to everlasting destruction, not won to eternal life by the price of His own blood.”
Antigone Journal (@AntigoneJournal) said: “Translation 2. The ellipse of esse is by the bye [sic] for Augustine, and this rendering is most faithful to the text.”

Cathedralulus (@Cathedralulus) said: “Translations 1 and 3. 2 if you think the construction as ellipses where esse is missing.”

Michael J. Lynch (@reformedtexan) said: “Translations 1 or 3.”

LatinPerDiem (@LatinPerDiem) did not make a choice,  but asked, “Also, why “bought” for comparari?”

Aquinas is an interesting secondary source:
Augustinus. Hoc autem dixit, quia videbat eos ad sempiternum interitum praedestinatos, non ad vitam aeternam sui sanguinis pretio comparatos: oves enim sunt credendo, pastorem sequendo.
From Aquinas.cc.
AUG He saw that they were persons predestinated to eternal death, and not those for whom He had bought eternal life, at the price of His blood. The sheep believe, and follow the Shepherd.
Augustine. (Tract. xlviii. c. 4.) He saw that they were persons predestinated to eternal death, and not those for whom He had bought eternal life, at the price of His blood. The sheep believe, and follow the Shepherd.
Thomas Aquinas, Catena Aurea: Commentary on the Four Gospels, Collected out of the Works of the Fathers: St. John, ed. John Henry Newman (Oxford: John Henry Parker, 1845), 359.

2.3.3. An Analysis of Wiggers’s Claim:

Response coming soon.

2.4. Ep. 169, c. 1:

Wiggers referenced Epistle 169 by Augustine written to Bishop Evodius (c. AD 415).

2.4.1. Wiggers’s Claim:

He wrote:
“No one perishes of those for whom Christ died.” Ep. 169, c. I.
Wiggers, An Historical Presentation of Augustinianism and Pelagianism from the Original Sources, 254.

2.4.2. The Primary Sources:

Latin Texts:
4. Nam si propter eos solos Christus mortuus est, qui certa intellegentia possunt ista discernere, pene frustra in Ecclesia laboramus. Si autem, quod veritas habet, infirmi populi credentium ad medicum currunt, sanandi per Christum, et hunc crucifixum, ut ubi abundavit peccatum, superabundet gratia; miris fit modis per altitudinem divitiarum sapientiae et scientiae Dei, et per inscrutabilia iudicia eius, ut et nonnulli a corporibus incorporea discernentes, cum sibi ex hoc magni videntur, et irrident stultitiam praedicationis, qua salvi fiunt credentes, ab unica via longe exerrent, quae ad vitam aeternam sola perducit: et multi in cruce Christi gloriantes, et ab eadem via non recedentes, etiamsi ista quae subtilissime disseruntur, ignorant, quia non perit unus pusillus mortuus est (Matt 18:14), ad eamdem perveniant aeternitatem, veritatem, caritatem, id est ad stabilem, certam, plenamque felicitatem, ubi manentibus, videntibus, amantibus sunt cuncta perspicua.
From Augustinus.it.
et multi in cruce Christi gloriantes, et ab eadem via non recedentes, etiamsi ista quae subtilissime disseruntur, ignorant, quia non perit unus ex illis pro quibus mortuus est, ad eamdem perveniant aeternitatem, veritatem, charitatem, id est ad stabilem, certam, plenamque felicitatem, ubi manentibus, videntibus, amantibus sunt cuncta perspicua.
Epistola CLXIX, Cap. 1, §4, PL 33:744 (2).

It is important to note that the above PL edition notes a manuscript discrepancy. It says:

1. Mss. duo v., non perit unus ex pusillis. Prope accedit Sulpitian. Cod., qui habet: Non perit unus pusillus, pro quibus, etc.
One AI translation puts it this way:
1. Two manuscripts, not one of the little ones perishes. Closely follows the Sulpitian. Cod., which has: Not one of the little ones perishes, for whom, etc.
Another AI translation has this:
1. Ms. two versions: None of the little ones perishes. The Sulpitian Codex approaches this, which has: None of the little ones perishes, instead of which, etc.
English Translations:
4. For if Christ died only on account of those who can distinguish these things with certain intelligence, we labor in the Church to almost no purpose. But if, as the truth has it, the weak people among the faithful run to the physician to be healed by Christ, and by him crucified, so that where sin has abounded (See Rom 5:20) grace might abound even more, it comes about in marvelous ways through the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God and through his inscrutable judgments (Rom 11:33) that some who can distinguish incorporeal things from bodies think that for this reason they are important people and mock the foolishness of preaching by which believers are saved, while they themselves wander far from the one path that alone leads to eternal life. But many who boast in the cross of Christ and do not depart from the same path, even those who do not know those things that are discussed with great subtlety, because not a single infant perishes for whom he has died,5 come to the same eternity, truth, and love, that is, to solid, certain, and complete happiness, where everything is clear for those who remain, see, and love.
_______________
5 Though the manuscripts and the contexts favor this reading, the passage seems open to the interpretation given by Jansenius that Christ did not die for all infants.
Saint Augustine, Letters (Epistulae) 156–210, trans. Roland Teske, ed. Boniface Ramsey, vol. II/3 of The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century (Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 2004), 108; italics original.
4. For if Christ died for those only who with clear intelligence can discern these things, our labour in the Church is almost spent in vain. But if, as is the fact, crowds of common people, possessing no great strength of intellect, run to the Physician in the exercise of faith, with the result of being healed by Christ and Him crucified, that “where sin has abounded, grace may much more abound” (Rom. 5:20), it comes in wondrous ways to pass, through the depths of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God and His unsearchable judgments, that, on the one hand, some who do discern between the material and: the spiritual in their own nature, while pluming themselves on this attainment, and despising that foolishness of preaching by which those who believe are saved, wander far from the only path which leads to eternal life; and, on the other hand, because not one perishes for whom Christ died (John 17:12),3 many glorying in the cross of Christ, and not withdrawing from that same path, attain, notwithstanding their ignorance of those things which some with most profound subtlety investigate, unto that eternity, truth, and love,—that is, unto that enduring, clear, and full felicity,—in which to those who abide, and see, and love, all things are plain.
Augustine of Hippo, “Letters of St. Augustin,” in The Confessions and Letters of St. Augustin with a Sketch of His Life and Work, ed. Philip Schaff, trans. J. G. Cunningham, vol. 1 of A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, First Series (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Company, 1886), 540.
For, if Christ died for those only who are able to discern these truths with sure understanding, our labor in the Church is almost worthless. But if, as truth holds, the believers among the peoples run to their Physician in their sickness to be healed by Christ, and Him crucified, so that ‘where sin abounded grace might more abound’ (Cf. Rom. 5:20), it happens in marvellous ways, ‘through the depth of the riches of the wisdom and of the knowledge of God,’ and by ‘his unsearchable judgments’ (Cf. Rom. 11:33) that some, because they can distinguish incorporeal from corporeal things, seem great to themselves, mock at the foolishness of the preaching through which they believed and were saved, and wander far from the one way which alone leads to eternal life. On the other hand, many who glory in the cross of Christ and do not withdraw from that same way, though ignorant of those points which are so subtlely debated, because not one little one perishes for whom He died (Matt. 18:14; John 17:12), attain to that same eternity, truth, charity, that is, to a fixed, sure, and complete happiness where all things are clear to those who remain faithful, who see, and who love.
Augustine of Hippo, Letters (165–203), ed. Hermigild Dressler, trans. Wilfrid Parsons, vol. 30 of The Fathers of the Church (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1955), 53–54.

2.4.3. An Analysis of Wiggers’s Claim:

Response coming soon.

Referencing? NKJ Matthew 18:14 "Even so it is not the will of your Father who is in heaven that one of these little ones should perish.

This text is referenced in the footnote of the Augustinus.it version above.

Or this? NKJ John 17:12 "While I was with them in the world, I kept them in Your name. Those whom You gave Me I have kept; and none of them is lost except the son of perdition, that the Scripture might be fulfilled.

2.5. De Trin. IV, 13:

Wiggers next referenced Augustine’s work On the Trinity.

2.5.1. Wiggers’s Claim:

He wrote:
Nay, according to his theory, Augustine would have no mediator between God and the whole human race, but only a mediator between God and the elect. “Christ redeemed the sinners who were to be justified (justificandos peccatores).” De Trin. IV. 13.
Wiggers, An Historical Presentation of Augustinianism and Pelagianism from the Original Sources, 255.

2.5.2. The Primary Sources:

Latin text:
Quocirca etiam ipso Domino se credebat diabolus superiorem, in quantum illi Dominus in passionibus cessit; quia et de ipso intellectum est quod in Psalmo legitur: Minuisti eum paulo minus ab Angelis 119, ut ab iniquo velut aequo iure adversus nos agente, ipse occisus innocens eum iure aequissimo superaret, atque ita captivitatem propter peccatum factam captivaret, nosque liberaret a captivitate propter peccatum iusta, suo iusto sanguine iniuste fuso mortis chirographum delens 120 et iustificandos redimens peccatores.
From Augustinus.it.
Quocirca etiam ipso Domino se credebat diabolus superiorem, in quantum illi Dominus in passionibus cessit; quia et de ipso intellectum est quod in Psalmo legitur, Minuisti eum paulo minus ab Angelis (Psal. VIII, 6): ut ab iniquo velut aequo jure adversum nos agente, ipse occisus innocens eum jure aequissimo superaret, atque ita captivitatem propter peccatum factam captivaret (Ephes. IV, 8), nosque liberaret a captivitate propter peccatum justa, suo justo sanguine injuste fuso mortis chirographum delens, et justificandos redimens peccatores.
From the Catholic Library.

English Translations:
Wherefore also the devil thought himself superior to the Lord Himself, inasmuch as the Lord in His sufferings yielded to him; for of Him, too, is understood what is read in the Psalm, “For Thou hast made Him a little lower than the angels:” (Ps. 8:5) so that He, being Himself put to death, although innocent, by the unjust one acting against us as it were by just right, might by a most just right overcome him, and so might lead captive the captivity wrought through sin (Eph. 4:8), and free us from a captivity that was just on account of sin, by blotting out the handwriting, and redeeming us who were to be justified although sinners, through His own righteous blood unrighteously poured out.
Augustine of Hippo, “On the Trinity,” in St. Augustin: On the Holy Trinity, Doctrinal Treatises, Moral Treatises, ed. Philip Schaff, trans. Arthur West Haddan, vol. 3 of A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, First Series (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Company, 1887), 78; 4.13.17.
And on this account the devil believed himself to be superior even to the Lord Himself, inasmuch as the Lord yielded to him in His sufferings, for what is written in the Psalm is to be also understood of Him: ‘Thou hast made him a little less than the angels’ (Ps. 8:6); thus He Himself, the innocent One, would be put to death by the sinful one, acting against us by a just right, in order that He might overcome him by a more just right, and so might take captive the captivity that was brought about by sin (Eph. 4:8), and liberate us from the captivity that was just on account of sin, by cancelling the handwriting of death and redeeming us who, though sinners, were to be justified through His just blood, that was unjustly poured out.
Augustine of Hippo, The Trinity, ed. Hermigild Dressler, trans. Stephen McKenna, vol. 45 of The Fathers of the Church (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1963), 153.
For this reason the devil thought himself superior even to the Lord, seeing that the Lord gave way to him in his sufferings, because it is of him that the psalm text is to be understood, You have made him a little less than the angels (Ps 8:6). Yet in being slain in his innocence by the wicked one, who was acting against us as it were with just rights, he won the case against him with the justest of all rights, and thus led captive the captivity (Eph 4:8; Ps 68:19) that was instituted for sin, and delivered us from the captivity we justly endured for sin, and by his just blood unjustly shed cancelled the I.O.U. (Col 2:14) of death, and justified and redeemed sinners.
Saint Augustine, The Trinity (De Trinitate), ed. John E. Rotelle, Second Edition., vol. I/5 of The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century (Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 2017), 203.

2.5.3. An Analysis of Wiggers’s Claim:

Response coming soon.

2.6. De Cor. et Gr. 15 (De correptione et gratia):

Lastly, Wiggers cited Augustine’s work On Rebuke and Grace.

2.6.1. Wiggers’s Claim:

He wrote:
Against Augustine’s limitation view of redemption, just presented, which is clear as the sun from the passages adduced, some doubtful expressions of his, and therefore proving nothing, may indeed be adduced; and especially one passage, which seems, at first view, to declare a directly contrary doctrine, viz., the universality of the work of redemption. This passage is found in De Cor. et Gr. 15. He there says, “Who has more loved the weak, than he who became weak for all and was crucified for all?” It would now be very remarkable for Augustine to have presented so contradictory a view, in this little book in which, as appears from so many passages already quoted, he so definitely and emphatically maintained the limitation. But the connection fully shows, that Augustine would by no means here maintain the universality of redemption. He is here calling to admonition and reproof, because we cannot know who is predestinated, and adduces as a reason for the call, the example of Christ. He had become man and endured the death of the cross for all, viz., those whom the Father would free from the misery of sin. To understand the passage as referring to the efficacy of the redeeming death as sufficient for all men, if they were to have been redeemed, would not accord with the spirit of Augustine. To him, as well as to his whole age, the speculation respecting the power of Christ’s atoning death, was foreign.
Wiggers, An Historical Presentation of Augustinianism and Pelagianism from the Original Sources, 255.

2.6.2. The Primary Sources:

Latin texts:
Et quis magis dilexit infirmos, quam ille qui pro omnibus est factus infirmus, et pro omnibus ex ipsa infirmitate crucifixus?
From Augustinus.it.
Et quis magis dilexit infirmos, quam ille qui pro omnibus est factus infirmus, et pro omnibus ex ipsa infirmitate crucifixus?
From the Catholic Library.

English Translations:
49. Hence, insofar as it is up to us who are not able to distinguish the predestined from those not predestined and who, for this reason, ought to will that all be saved, we must use a severe rebuke for all as medicine in order that they do not perish or cause others to perish. But it is up to God to make the rebuke beneficial for those whom he has himself foreknown and predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son (Rom 8:29). For, if at times we do not give a rebuke out of fear that someone might perish because of the rebuke, why do we not also give a rebuke out of fear that someone might perish for lack of a rebuke?

We, after all, do not have a heart more filled with love than the blessed apostle who says, Rebuke the restless; comfort the fearful; support the weak; show patience toward all; see that no one returns evil for evil (1 Thes 5:14–15). Here we should understand that one returns evil for evil, especially if one does not rebuke a person who needs to be rebuked, but neglects this under a blameworthy pretext. The apostle also says, Rebuke sinners in front of all in order that the rest may have fear (1 Tm 5:20). This should be understood with regard to those sins which are not hidden so that the apostle is not thought to have spoken contrary to the mind of the Lord. For he said, If your brother sins against you, rebuke him privately (Mt 18:15). He himself, nonetheless, carries the severity of a rebuke to such a point that he says, If he does not listen even to the Church, let him be for you like a Gentile or a publican (Mt 18:17). And who loved the weak more than he who became weak for all and was crucified for all because of this weakness (See 2 Cor 13:4)? Since this is so, grace does not prevent a rebuke, nor does a rebuke exclude grace. And for this reason we ought to command righteousness in such a way that we ask from God in faith-filled prayer for the grace by which what we command may be done. And we ought to do both of these without neglecting to give a just rebuke. But let all these actions be done with love because love does not commit sin and covers a multitude of sins (1 Pt 4:8).
Saint Augustine, “Rebuke and Grace,” in Answer to the Pelagians, IV, ed. John E. Rotelle, trans. Roland J. Teske, vol. 26 of The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century (Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 1999), 90–91; De correptione et gratia, 16.49; italics original.
CHAPTER 49.—CONCLUSION

Hence, as far as concerns us, who are not able to distinguish those who are predestinated from those who are not, we ought on this very account to will all men to be saved. Severe rebuke should be medicinally applied to all by us that they perish not themselves, or that they may not be the means of destroying others. It belongs to God, however, to make that rebuke useful to them whom He Himself has foreknown and predestinated to be conformed to the image of His Son. For, if at any time we abstain from rebuking, for fear lest by rebuke a man should perish, why do we not also rebuke, for fear lest a man should rather perish by our withholding it? For we have no greater bowels of love than the blessed apostle who says, “Rebuke those that are unruly; comfort the feeble-minded; support the weak; be patient towards all men. See that none render to any man evil for evil” (1 Thess. 5:14). Where it is to be understood that evil is then rather rendered for evil when one who ought to be rebuked is not rebuked, but by a wicked dissimulation is neglected. He says, moreover, “Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear” (1 Tim. 5:20); which must be received concerning those sins which are not concealed, lest he be thought to have spoken in opposition to the word of the Lord. For He says, “If thy brother shall sin against thee, rebuke him between thee and him” (Matt. 18:15). Notwithstanding, He Himself carries out the severity of rebuke to the extent of saying, “If he will not hear the Church, let him be unto thee as a heathen man and a publican” (Matt. 18:17). And who has more loved the weak than He who became weak for us all, and of that very weakness was crucified for us all? And since these things are so, grace neither restrains rebuke, nor does rebuke restrain grace; and on this account righteousness is so to be prescribed that we may ask in faithful prayer, that, by God’s grace, what is prescribed may be done; and both of these things are in such wise to be done that righteous rebuke may not be neglected. But let all these things be done with love, since love both does not sin, and does cover the multitude of sins.
Augustine of Hippo, “A Treatise on Rebuke and Grace,” in Saint Augustin: Anti-Pelagian Writings, ed. Philip Schaff, trans. Robert Ernest Wallis, vol. 5 of A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, First Series (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1887), 491.

2.6.3. An Analysis of Wiggers’s Claim:

Response coming soon.

2.7 An Analysis of Other Miscellaneous Claims:

Response coming soon.

3. Conclusion

Response coming soon.